
Save energy use
System: Pigs
Mainly applicable for: Intensively rearered indoor pig herds with a high energy demand.
Not applicable or effective for: Less applicable for outdoor pigs
Description
Saving energy use for on-farm processes by installing energy-efficient techniques or reducing energy-demanding activities. Energy can be saved in various on-farm processes, such as ventilation, heating and feeding animals. Besides more energy-efficient machinery, it is important to use properly sized machinery.
Options for saving energy use are, for example:
- Localised heating in the creep area of farrowing houses can reduce energy by heating only the area occupied by the piglets, possibly using renewable heat from slurry cooling or other renewable energy.
- Heat exchanger to cool slurry, providing hot water which can be used for heating rooms with young pigs or for washing;
- Heat pumps, using significantly less electricity than conventional heating systems;
- Ventilation in intensive pig farming can use a lot of electricity so ensuring efficient operation can reduce electricity consumption and hence emissions;
Mechanism of effect
Saving on energy use for on-farm processes means less CO2 is emitted due to less fossil fuel combustion. Depending on the specific action this can concern either reduction of on-farm fossil fuel combustion, or reduction of purchased electricity or fuel. This solution will be less effective when renewable or low carbon energy is used in the reference situation. Using a heat exchanger to cool slurry also reduces the methane emissions from the slurry (and ammonia) due to less methanogenesis at lower temperatures.
Reference situation
Average European grid mix. No energy-efficient techniques installed.
Legend
| ● – Small effect (<5%) | o – No effect | o – no effect |
| ●● – Medium effect (5-20%) | ● – Unfavourable effect | ? – unknown effect |
| ●●● – Large effect (>20%) | ● – ● – Variable effect (depending on farm characteristics or way/level of implementation) |
Effect on total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (kg CO2-eq)
| per kg product | per farm (absolute) | Level of evidence | |||
| Mean | (min-max) | Mean | (min-max) | ||
| Slurry heat exchange | ● | ●–● | ● | ●–● | High |
| Heat pump | ● | ●–● | ● | ●–● | High |
| Economic ventilation | ● | ●–● | ● | ●–● | High |
| Localised heating in the creep area | ● | ●–● | ● | ●–● | High |
Effect per emission source
| Source | Manure storage | Animals | Feed and forage production | Barn | ||||
| Gas | CH4 | N2O | CH4 | CO2 | N2O | LUC | CO2 | |
| Slurry heat exchange | ●● | |||||||
| Direct expansion heat pump | ●● | |||||||
| Economic ventilation | ●● | |||||||
| Localised heating in the creep area | ●● | |||||||
*risk of an adverse effect (see ’cause of variable or unfavourable effect’)
Explanation of variable effect
Slurry cooling
Effect depends on the initial slurry temperature and the slurry storage time and on the use of the renewable heat.
Direct expansion heat pump
Depends on the demand for heating, which depends on the climate.
Economical ventilation
Depending on the efficiency of the original system and the demand for ventilation. Most benefit should be gained in hot climates where significant ventilation is needed.
Localised heating in the creep area
Depends on the original method of providing heat for piglets.