
Apply organic fertilizers
System: Arable crops
Mainly applicable for: Either for partial or total substitution of synthetic mineral fertilisers. Suitable for all but some supply chains may stipulate types/amounts of organic fertilisers to be added to crops. Consideration must be given to when and how fertilisers are added to avoid pollution and improve effectiveness.
Not applicable or effective for: Single year application; Regions with low resource availability (manure, biomass); In vulnerable areas, it is not possible to reach a total substitution.
Description
Applying plant- or animal-derived materials containing organic forms of nutrients to soils (contrary to synthetic fertilizers). Unlike synthetic fertilizers, which are chemically manufactured, organic fertilizers are derived from natural sources, such as plant matter (e.g., compost, green manure) or animal manures. By using organic fertilizers active nitrogen is recycled and production of synthetic fertilisers is avoided. Organic fertilizers contain organic forms of nutrients that are decomposed by microorganisms in the soil, making them available for use by plants and improving soil structure and increasing microbial activity.
The effects on the N₂O emissions and SOC variations will differ depending on: (i) the reference situation and whether the substitution of mineral fertilisers is total or partial, (ii) the type and composition of the organic fertilisers (solid or more liquid product, nitrogen and carbon contents), (iii) the cropping systems and crop receiving the application, and (iv) the combination of soil and climate conditions.
Mechanism of effect
Applying organic nitrogen (N) fertilizer instead synthetic N fertilizer can reduce total GHG emissions mainly because this avoids CO₂ from the manufacturing and transport of synthetic fertilizer and improves nitrogen use efficiency. According to IPCC, the same amount of direct nitrous oxide (N₂O) is emitted from a given quantity of nitrogen applied as synthetic and organic fertilisers in dry climates, but in wet climates organic fertilisers emit less N₂O. In addition, organic fertilisation increases C inputs to the soil. The net effect depends on the balance between soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation and GHG emissions. Compared with no fertilization, applying organic fertilizer increases N₂O emissions from soils and increase fuel use, but also strongly boosts crop yields, and reduces GHG emissions per kg of product. Because organic fertilizers contribute to build up SOC stock, it may reduce net emissions.
The solution should be implemented with an adapted management and application strategy. The priority is to target a good synchronisation between the mineralisation of organic fertilisers and the period of high nitrogen uptake by the crop (easier with spring or summer crops such as maize than wintern crop such as wheat, except for the case of rapeseed, a winter crop very efficient to use nitrogen avalable in the soil in autumn). In addition, a portion of N from organic fertilisers will not be available immediatly to the crop (joining the more stable soil organic matter) and the rate of organic fertilizer application should be calculated according to the mineral fertilisers equivalence factor to target the given expected yield.
Reference situation
No fertilization or synthetic fertilizer only
Legend
| ● – Small effect (<5%) | o – No effect | o – no effect |
| ●● – Medium effect (5-20%) | ● – Unfavourable effect | N/A – unknown effect |
| ●●● – Large effect (>20%) | ● – ● – Variable effect (depending on farm characteristics or way/level of implementation) |
Effect on total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (kg CO2-eq)
| Mean effect and range in kg CO2-equivalents | per ha | Level of evidence | ||
| Mean | min-max | |||
| Organic fertilizer vs. synthetic fertilizer | ? | ●● – ●●● | High | |
| Organic fertilizer vs. no fertilizer | ●● | ●● – ●● | Medium | |
Effect per emission source
| Mean effect on absolute emission from | Soil | Inputs | Energy use | ||
| N2O | CO2 | CO2 | |||
Organic fertilizer vs. synthetic fertilizer | ●* | ●●● | ● | ||
| Organic fertilizer vs. no fertilizer | ●● | ● | |||
*risk of an adverse effect (see ’cause of variable or unfavourable effect’)
Effect on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks
| Relative change (%) in SOC%: | ||||
| Mean | (min-max) | Level of evidence | ||
| Organic fertilizer vs. synthetic fertilizer | ● ● | ● – ●●● | High | |
| Organic fertilizer vs. no organic fertilizer | ●●● | o– ●●● | High | |
| Organic+synthetic fertilizer vs. synthetic fertilizer | ●● | o– ●●● | Medium | |
| Organic+synthetic fertilizer vs.no fertilizer | ●●● | ●●●– ●●● | High | |
| ● – small increase (<10%) | ● – small decrease (<5%) | o – no effect |
| ●● – medium increase (10-25%) | ●●– large decrease (≥5%) | ? – unknown effect |
| ●●● – large increase (>25%) | ● – ● – Variable effect (depending on farm characteristics or way/level of implementation) |
Explanation of variable effect
Organic fertilizer vs. synthetic fertilizer
The effects can vary greatly from one organic product to another. The potential reduction of emission depends on the type of organic products, on the storage or waste source used or energy source for the production of the given organic fertiliser. Some type of products or situation could even provide increase emissions. In addition, consideration must be given to when and how fertilisers are added to avoid pollution and improve effectiveness. The effect will be different if this is a partial or total substitution of mineral fertilisers with organic fertilisers.
1- Upstream: The key difference between the emissions from the two types of fertilizers is based on the energy consumption and GHG emissions during the production of the synthetic fertilizer that is replaced. Depending the process of the organic fertiliser, it will receive a more or less heavy part of the uptstream impact with its “waste” status in the LCA allocation.
2- In the field, the effect on nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions depends on climate and fertilizer type, with lower N₂O emission from organic N fertilizer compared to synthetic N fertilizer in wet climates, similar otherwise. Effects on N₂O also depend on environmental factors (such as soil organic C content, soil texture, drainage, soil pH, temperature and freeze-thaw cycle) and management practices (such as N application rate; fertilizer type, liquid or solid form of organic fertilizer; irrigation and type of crop). Synthetic fertilizer provides a more immediate and concentrated source of nitrogen which may lead to higher N₂O emissions if not managed properly. Organic fertilizers release nitrogen more slowly as they decompose, which can result in lower N₂O emissions, and favor soil health and microbial diversity, potentially reducing N₂O emissions over time. The choice of the recipient crop is crucial to get avoid leaching conditions and to target the right timing to matching the crop demands. The priority is to target a good synchronisation between the mineralisation of organic fertilisers and the period of high nitrogen uptake by the crop : easier with spring or summer crops such as maize than wintern crop such as wheat, except for the case of rapeseed a winter crop very efficient to use nitrogen avalable in the soil in autumn.
Therefore the scope for improvement lies mainly in making better use of avalable organic fertilisers by improving spreading conditions to reduce nitrogen losses and taking greater account of their fertilising value, bearing in mind that there is considerable variability (depending on the conditions of the year).
3- The effect on SOC depends on the type of organic fertilizer: organic fertilizer with large amount of easily decomposable C stimulate microbial growth which stabilize SOC. Other factors include (i) fertilizer quality: organic fertilizers with low C:N ratio are decomposed faster; (ii) climate and soil texture: smaller SOC increase in warm and dry conditions and higher SOC increase in fine-textured soils.
Organic fertilizer vs. no fertilizer
The effect depends on the quantities applied, the nature of the product and the characteristics of the soil. The part of the mineral nitrogen (TAN) content of the organic fertilisers will define the level of NH3 emissions right at the application (leading to nitrogen redeposition elsewhere) and the total N content will determine the level of N2O emissions from the soils linked to the soil microbiological activity.
| Literature references | Organic fertilizer vs. mineral fertilizer |
|---|---|
| Zavattaro et al., 2017 | Agronomic effects of bovine manure: A review of long-term European field experiments |
| Wei et al., 2020 | Substitution of Mineral Fertilizer with Organic Fertilizer in Maize Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Reduced Nitrogen and Carbon Emissions |
| Aguilera et al., 2013 | Managing soil carbon for climate change mitigation and adaptation in Mediterranean cropping systems: A meta-analysis |
| Luo et al., 2019 | Crop Yield and Nitrous Oxide Emissions following Swine Manure Application: A Meta-Analysis |
| Chen et al., 2018 | The long-term role of organic amendments in building soil nutrient fertility: a meta-analysis and review |
| Han et al., 2017 | N2O emissions from grain cropping systems: a meta-analysis of the impacts of fertilizer-based and ecologically-based nutrient management strategies |
| Zhou et al., 2017 | Stimulation of N2O emission by manure application to agricultural soils may largely offset carbon benefits: a global meta-analysis |
| Beillouin et al., 2023 | A globalmeta-analysis of soil organic carbon in the Anthropocene |
| Liu et al., 2012 | Meta-Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Swine Manure Land Application |
| Charles et al., 2017 | Global nitrous oxide emission factors from agricultural soils after addition of organic amendments: A meta-analysis |
| Allan et al. 2022 | Influence of Organic and Mineral Fertilizers on Soil Organic Carbon and Crop Productivity under Different Tillage Systems: A Meta-Analysis |
| Menegat et al. 2022 | Greenhouse gas emissions from global production and use of nitrogen synthetic fertilisers in agriculture |
| RASE 2022 | https://www.rase.org.uk/content/large/documents/reports/farm_of_the_future-_journey_to_net_zero.pdf |
| skinner et al 2014 | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.098 |
| Literature references | Organic fertilizer vs. no fertilizer |
| Xia et al., 2020 | Response of N2O emission to manure application in field trials of agricultural soils across the globe |
| Diacono et al., 2010 | Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. A review |
| Beillouin et al., 2023 | A globalmeta-analysis of soil organic carbon in the Anthropocene |
| Crystal-Ornelas et al. 2021 | Soil organic carbon is affected by organic amendments, conservation tillage, and cover cropping in organic farming systems: A meta-analysis |
| Pellerin S. et al., 2020 | Stocker du carbone dans les sols français, Quel potentiel au regard de l’objectif de 4 pour 1000 et à quel coût ? Synthèse du rapport d’étude. Paris : INRA, 117 p. |
| Literature references | Organic+synthetic fertilizer vs. synthetic fertilizer |
| Maaz et al., 2021 | Meta-analysis of yield and nitrous oxide outcomes for nitrogen management in agriculture |
| Zavattaro et al., 2017 | Agronomic effects of bovine manure: A review of long-term European field experiments |
| Allan et al. 2022 | Influence of Organic and Mineral Fertilizers on Soil Organic Carbon and Crop Productivity under Different Tillage Systems: A Meta-Analysis |